Kansas
Transportation
We are nearing the
completion of a ten-year comprehensive
transportation program passed in 1999. In this
economic downturn we will be forced to temporarily
scale back. Some projects are moving forward
but several are on hold until more funding becomes
available.
In a tight budget year
when our most critical investments face
reductions, transportation projects may seem
frivolous. We must not underestimate the
importance of a quality infrastructure. It
is estimated that for every $1 spent on improving
our transportation infrastructure, we receive a $3
return in the form of economic benefit for the
state. The expiring transportation program
resulted in 25,000 new jobs for Kansas workers
over ten years. Additionally, interest rates
are currently at historic lows and construction
materials are drastically lower than they were a
year ago. Investing in transportation
projects now will not only get folks back to work,
it will save taxpayer dollars in the long run.
Last summer the Governor
created the T-LINK Task Force (Transportation -
Leveraging Investments in Kansas) to further
explore needs and opportunities throughout Kansas'
transportation system. The task force,
headed by Department of Transportation Secretary
Deb Miller, is looking for a new approach to
transportation that reflects today's realities but
also creates a framework that prepares for the
future of Kansas. |
House Energy Committee hears
Net Metering Proposal
This week, the House
Energy and Utilities Committee stayed busy when it
held hearings on legislation that would establish
net metering in Kansas. Net metering is an
opportunity for customers to generate their own
electricity by way of renewable resource, meter it
bi-directionally on one meter, and receive credit
for their contributions, paying only for the "net"
electricity provided to them by their
utility. House Bills 2043 and 2051 are
mirror bills, meaning they are essentially the
same piece of legislation, only one addresses wind
generation and the other addresses solar
generation. Net metering is already offered in 35
states.
Similar to the RPS
proposals heard by the committee, I expect other
net metering proposals to come before the
committee in the near future and I will keep you
up to date as those proposals surface. I am
hopefully we will find a way to create an
effective and productive policy that advances our
long-term energy goals for the state.
|
|