In This Issue
Budget Revisions
Guantanamo Resolution
Across the Board Cuts and Schools
Department of Commerce Helps Businesses
Attracting Out of State Students
Committee Considers Annexation Legislation
Rescission Bill Passes
 

Join Our Mailing List

Legislative Newsletter 3

Dear Friends and Family,

Despite the slow start to the session, the legislature is quickly making up lost ground.  We have debated issues ranging from the 2009 Budget, Annexation, school funding and health care availability.  As we debate and examine these extremely important issues in one of our state's most difficult times, I am constantly reminded of the honor and duty I have representing Northeast Johnson County. 

Again, I thank you for the opportunity to represent you, and I hope the following information is helpful for you.  Please don't hesitate to contact me with any issues that may come up.

State Representative Mike Slattery
Representative Mike Slattery

House Approves Guantanamo Resolution
This week the House approved a joint resolution to voice opposition to placing war/terrorist detainees from Gitmo at Fort Leavenworth.  Specifically, the Resolution outlines reasons why the Leavenworth community is not appropriate for this serious duty.   

If this becomes a mission of the Fort, our capable military will do it; but the damage to the international officer program and, as a result, international relations, and the negative impact upon the Command and General Staff College mission to educate our military leaders and craft the military strategies for our nation will be a price paid for such a decision.  We want the President, Vice President, our Congressional delegation and our Governor to know the particular problems with placing this mission in our state.
 

Across the Board Cuts and the Impact on Kansas Schools

Dale Dennis, Assistant Commissioner of Education and the state's chief expert on school finance, spoke to the Democratic members and answered questions from the caucus on Thursday.  Dennis concentrated on the effects of the 3.4% across the board cuts proposed by Republican Senators and what that would mean for individual school districts.

Dennis told the caucus that the 3.4% cut would actually mean a much larger cut for schools in the last 5 months of the fiscal year.  With about 80% of school district budgets tied up in contractual obligations - many of which are for classroom teachers - districts will be hard pressed to implement the cuts as proposed.  Field trips for students, cleaning classrooms, routine maintenance, textbooks, classroom materials, athletic programs, and other student-related expenses will be on the chopping block for this year if the cuts would have gone through as proposed.  Though it looks as if school districts have been saved for this fiscal year, we must continue this discussion in an effort to protect education in FY 2010.
 

Department of Commerce Helps Minority and Women Owned Businesses

Last June, Governor Kathleen Sebelius signed an executive order to support Kansas small, minority and women-owned businesses.  Led by Rep. Annie Tietze and a coalition of Kansas small business/minority and women business organizations, many Kansas businesses can now take advantage of contracting and subcontracting opportunities from those in the private and public sectors committed to the inclusion of minority and women-owned businesses.  

Specifically, the executive order expanded the current Kansas Statewide Certification Program, where women and minority businesses can now obtain a Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) or a Woman Business Enterprise (WBE) Certification. With the creation of the MBE/WBE Certification Program, the personal net worth cap was eliminated, which allows more minority and women-owned businesses an opportunity to obtain certification and in turn create additional opportunities for them to compete in the procurement and contracting arena where goals have been established for minority and women-owned businesses.


Higher Education Committee to Attract Out-of-State Students

The House Higher Education committee was again very busy this week. On Tuesday we heard testimony from a panel of University of Kansas officials, representing the Kansas Board of Regents Universities.  They came as proponents of House Bill 2007, which would grant the Board of Regents the ability to offer discounts or waivers to out-of- state legacy high school graduates.  Currently, all neighboring states- and many in the region- have incorporated "legacy" programs.  For example in Iowa, the state pays the entire difference between out-of-state legacy students and in-state tuition.  While House Bill 2007 does not go that far, it does give the Board of Regents authority to offer a discount.  

Proponents of the bill believe the legislation is extremely important to future success of the state universities of Kansas. State universities need programs that not only helps keep the best and brightest in Kansas but also help incentivize  some of the best minds in the country to pursue higher education in our state.  Officials from the University of Kansas stated that this measure will be revenue neutral because they expect a significant number of the 90,000 alumni currently residing out of state will send their children to Kansas for college.  Increased enrollment numbers will offset any cost to the state caused by the initial discount.
 
Local Government Committee Considers Annexation Legislation

This week the Local Government Committee held a hearing for House Bill 2029, which addressed annexation and deannexation procedures for cities.  The bill was produced from the Special Committee on Eminent Domain in Condemnation of Water Rights and focuses on land owner rights.   

Two major amendments were offered to the existing bill.  The first would require a city to provide the board of county commissioners with a copy of the plan for extension of services when an annexation takes place.  The second would change the time regulation of when the county should call a hearing to consider whether the city has complied with all services' promises.  The current law says the county should consider this hearing in five years, the bill proposes to change to three years.

Testimony heard by the committee was mixed. Those who opposed the legislation thought annexation could bring more costs to the city, raise the mil levy, and require too much up keep for the city.  There was also fear that the content of the bill would be changed when it reached the House for consideration.  Those in favor of the bill were pleased with the bill because it gave protection to the citizens.  It was also stated that the plans that have to be submitted to the board of county commissioners would be a very helpful tool for them.  There was a consensus reached that the legislation provided many "common sense" changes that "need to be done".